Module 3 Guiding Light

Hi there, would you like us to help you do this question?

We are professional assignment help service for students who can't even. Get your papers written starting at just $11.99 a page.

Do my question How much will it cost?

Project Id:

Meet your deadlines with our essay writing service and let our professional writers take care of it!
Create your project now and start getting help in 2 minutes
Just from $12/Page
Order Now


Posted By:


Project Title:

Module 3 Guiding Light

Writing Type:


Project Type:






Number Of Pages:

2     Double-spaced (600 words)

Number Of Sources:


Type of Document:

Online Course

Academic Level:


Citation Style:




Solution Files(s):



Module 3 – Guiding Assignment: 1. What are some of the different ways we use language? 2. What is the value in medical ethics of the action/omission distinction? How may it cause confusion? 3. What concern does Devettere have with the withdrawal/withholding treatment distinction? 4. What is the relationship of the issue of paternalism and autonomy in health care ethics? Why is this relationship an important issue? 5. What is your understanding of the “principle of the double effect,” and how does it relate to the distinction between immoral and intrinsically immoral? 6. What was the position of Aquinas on the notion of intrinsically evil acts? 7. How would you describe the position of Kant on intrinsically evil acts? 8. What is Devettere’s position on deontological ethical theories of ethical decision making? 9. Name the distinctions which Devettere thinks helpful in moral reasoning. Which do you think is most important and why? 10. Relying on chapter 3 of A Primer for Health Care Ethics, define the concepts, “Terminal Illness,” “Quality of Life,” and “Active and Passive Euthanasia.” Why is a nuanced and clear understanding of these terms essential to responding to the case of Larry McAfee, the young quadriplegic man from Georgia who was introduced in the “Perspective” slide introducing this module? Step 2: After answering the questions, conclude with the following process: 1. Summarize the main points made in the reading or readings as concisely, but as completely, as you can. What went on in these texts (whether in print or online)? Feel free to provide brief illustrative quotations from the texts (with page numbers in parentheses after the quotations) to help make your point. Where there are many readings assigned, their main points generally overlap; therefore, do your best to succinctly present what’s most crucial. 2. State what you thought was most interesting about what you read. Your aim should be to personalize (that is, say what these readings taught you, what you found interesting or of value), rather than to summarize (as you did in the first part). Use phrases like the following: “From these readings, I learned…” or “I didn’t used to understand…but now I do because…,” or “What I found interesting was…,” and so on. Sources/Textbook: Devettere, Raymond. Practical Decision Making in Health Care Ethics: Cases and Concepts. 3rd ed. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2010. ISBN-13: 9781589012516. Chapter 3 Kelly, David F., Gerard Magill, and Henk Ten Have. Contemporary Catholic Health Care Ethics. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2013. Print. ISBN: 978-1-58901-960-7. Chapters 5, 12, 13,14. O’Rourke, Kevin, ed. A Primer for Health Care Ethics: Essays for a Pluralistic Society. 2nd ed. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2000. ISBN-13: 9780878408023. Chapter 3

Get your college paper done by experts

Do my question How much will it cost?

Place an order in 3 easy steps. Takes less than 5 mins.

Needs help with similar assignment?

we are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Order Over WhatsApp Place an Order Online