The supplemental materials describe the process of calculating WACC (PDF) and go on to apply the results to valuing a firm both unlevered (no debt) and levered (debt). The levered firm is shown to be more valuable. Two identical firms (see the supplemental materials) and the firm with debt is more highly valued. Does this make sense? Why or Why not? Why not use 100 percent debt financing if debt increases value?
Unemployed-professor.com is a unique service that provides guidance with different types of content. Please rest assured that the service is absolutely legal and doesn’t violate any regulations.
First time here? Give it a try and get 15% OFF your first order! Order Now